🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has become part of the increasing number of actors who express doubts about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their assistance while working on her new movie Die My Love.

Understanding the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

On-set intimacy professionals were introduced following the #MeToo movement to ensure the security and comfort of performers during sequences involving partial undress and intimate moments. However, numerous prominent performers including Jennifer Aniston and Sean Bean have voiced concerns about their presence, with several suggesting they disrupt artistic process.

Jennifer's Personal Experience

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while discussing her latest project where she portrays a character descending into postpartum disturbance, Lawrence commented: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we did have one but didn't really utilize them... I felt completely safe with Robert."

She elaborated: "Rob is not pervy and deeply devoted to his partner. Our conversations mostly focused on family life and personal connections. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or questions about professional limits."

"Had there been even a hint of unease, I would have requested an intimacy coordinator. Numerous male performers take offense if you aren't interested in their attention, and subsequently the negative treatment starts. He was not like that."

Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate

Earlier this week, entertainment database IMDb officially recognized intimacy coordinators as a distinct credit, together with multiple additional professional roles including choreography, catering, and puppetry. Previously, they were categorized as "additional crew" rather than having their specific credit.

Despite this recognition, intimacy coordinators still encounter media scrutiny implying they aren't necessarily required standards, with high-profile performers rejecting their participation. Jennifer's viewpoint echoes that of another prominent actress, who earlier revealed she declined professional supervision while working with Jon Hamm on their television series.

Aniston's Experience

"Jon was such a gentleman – truly every move, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she recalled. "It was also very choreographed. That's the advantage of working with skilled editors, suitable lighting. So, you don't prepare."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Honestly, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're experienced professionals – we can handle this. And we had Mimi present."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Although including multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, Anora – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning film about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – proceeded without an on-set professional.

Mikey Madison stated she and fellow actor her screen partner "concluded it would be best to maintain privacy."

"My character is a sex worker, and I had studied the director's work and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was mentally prepared for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."

These statements provoked significant backlash from industry professionals, similar to the reaction to another actress's public statements, who earlier this year shared that filming her new movie Marty Supreme represented her initial experience with the emerging role, which she "did not know existed."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about personal ease with a specific move alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, Paltrow responded: "I belong to the generation where you remove clothing, you get in bed, the filming begins."

She continued that she and Chalamet then informed the professional: "We think we're comfortable. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, industry executive Caroline Hollick labeled them "irresponsible" and highlighted that the majority of those speaking against intimacy coordinators possess sufficient fame to command their own power and protection on production locations.

"Occasionally an performer makes comments about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "Gwyneth Paltrow stated she grew up in a period when people in Hollywood 'removed clothing and got on with it'. As a established actress in Hollywood working with a actor considerably junior than her, while I'm sure he is comfortable, I considered it somewhat concerning statement."

Male Perspective

Michael Douglas, in contrast, shared that he feels the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes falls on the male performer, instead of a third party.

"Based on my career, you assume duty as the male actor to ensure the woman is comfortable, you discuss it completely," he said. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's occurring organically, which is hopefully what authentic performance looks like."